On Brand Illustrations in Ten Minutes, by Anyone
Only product designers at Driversnote could make brand illustrations.
It took days per asset. Results drifted with whoever made them. Nothing was documented.
I led the project, holding workshops at each milestone, and built a system anyone could run.
An Illustration Spec the Brand Should Have Had All Along
The brand had a typography spec and a colour spec; illustrations had drifted because nothing constrained them.
I broke a customer sentiment, "Mature Simplicity Built on Trust & Accuracy," into four characteristics: aesthetic tone, form language, colour and light, character design. Aesthetic tone was clean, calm, competent; characters were adult. The four characteristics did for illustration what the type spec had always done for type: bound the choices.
Those four characteristics filtered every illustration that followed.

The Sweet Spot Between Brand Fit and Production Speed
The rules narrowed the field, and Midjourney still returned thousands of plausible answers.
I mapped tone to surfaces, with expressive for marketing, balanced for empty states, and functional for in-product. The team plotted references against a second axis of brand alignment versus production effort and dot-voted the survivors. I built the workflow on top: five minutes of Gemini editing, then fifteen of human cleanup.
The framework is what made the AI useful, not the other way around.
Ten Minutes, No Designer in the Loop
The output is a documented system, not a one-off illustration.
I documented the workflow in Figma. The asset bank holds more than a hundred illustrations across the spectrum. Marketing produces what marketing needs, product fills its own empty states, and the design team writes the system instead of staffing the queue.
Customer phrases became style characteristics, then a framework, then ten minutes of work anyone in the company could do.
The working folder.
Sketches, dead-ends, and illustrations that didn't make the case.


